2023 AMD Construction Read Case 3 AMD Construction in the text pg 448 450 and | Assignments Online

2023 AMD Construction Read Case 3 AMD Construction in the text pg 448 450 and | Assignments Online

Assignments Online 2023 Business Finance

AMD Construction

Read Case 3: AMD Construction in the text (pg. 448-450), and answer the following questions in a three- to four-page paper, excluding the title and reference pages, justifying your conclusions.  Your paper should be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.  

  • After reviewing Chapter 14, evaluate the negotiations between Tom Reed and Jane Axle.  What are your recommendations for Jane Axle as far as the next step in the negotiation process?  
  • Develop a comprehensive quantitative analysis of the negotiations between Jane Axle and Tom Reed. Provide a chart to show financial impacts (see suggestion of format for quantitative analysis of the negotiations below) 
  • Appraise the capital equipment acquisition decision and recommend if Reed should purchase or lease the CAT-1 if he chooses to go with Allen Manufacturing Company. 

Suggestion of format for quantitative analysis of the negotiations:

 

Current Machine

CAT-1 machine-purchase

CAT-1 machine – Lease

Operating cost (without operators)

 

 

 

Direct Labor  

 

 

 

Depreciation (straight line) 4 months

 

 

 

Lease Expense 4 Months

 

 

 

Interest expense at 8% for 4 months

 

 

 

Salvage Value after 3 years

 

 

 

Unexpected Costs

 

 

 

Totals

 

 

 

Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

 

Description:

 

Total Possible Score: 8.00

Evaluates the Negotiations Between Reed and Jane Axle, and Provides Recommendations for Jane Axle

Total: 2.50

Distinguished – Provides a thorough evaluation of the negotiations and comprehensive recommendations for Jane Axle.

Proficient – Provides an evaluation of the negotiations and recommendations for Jane Axle. The evaluation or recommendation are missing minor details.

Basic – Provides a partial evaluation of the negotiations and limited recommendations for Jane Axle. The evaluation and/or recommendation are missing relevant details.

Below Expectations – Attempts to provide an evaluation of the negotiations and provide recommendations for Jane Axle; however, the evaluation and recommendation are missing significant details.

Non-Performance – The evaluation of the negotiations and the recommendations for Jane Axle are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the instructions.

 

Develop a Comprehensive Quantitative Analysis and Chart of the Negotiations between Jane Axle and Tom Reed

Total: 2.50

Distinguished – Provides a comprehensive quantitative analysis and accurate chart of the negotiations.

Proficient – Provides a quantitative analysis and chart of the negotiations. Minor details are missing or inaccurate from the analysis or chart.

Basic – Provides a quantitative analysis and chart of the negotiations. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate from the analysis and/or chart.

Below Expectations – Attempts to provide a quantitative analysis and chart of the negotiations; however, significant details are missing and inaccurate from the analysis and chart.

Non-Performance – The analysis and chart of the negotiations are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the instructions.

 

Appraises the Capital Equipment Acquisition Decision and Recommends if Tom Reed Should Purchase or Lease the CAT-1 if he Chooses to go with Allen Manufacturing Company

Total: 2.00

Distinguished – Accurately appraises and thoroughly recommends if Tom Reed should purchase or lease the CAT-1 if he chooses to go with Allen Manufacturing Company.

Proficient – Appraises and recommends if Tom Reed should purchase or lease the CAT-1 if he chooses to go with Allen Manufacturing Company. Minor details are missing or inaccurate from the appraisal or recommendation.

Basic – Partially appraises and recommends if Tom Reed should purchase or lease the CAT-1 if he chooses to go with Allen Manufacturing Company. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate from the appraisal and/or recommendation.

Below Expectations – Attempts to appraise and recommend if Tom Reed should purchase or lease the CAT-1 if he chooses to go with Allen Manufacturing Company; however, significant details are missing and inaccurate from the appraisal and recommendation.

Non-Performance – The appraisal and recommendation are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the instructions.

 

Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues

Total: 0.17

Distinguished – Clearly and comprehensively explains the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.

Proficient – Clearly explains the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.

Basic – Briefly explains the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.

Below Expectations – Briefly explains the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. 

 

Integrative Learning: Connections to Discipline

Total: 0.17

Distinguished – Autonomously synthesizes or draws conclusions by combining examples, facts, or theories from multiple disciplines. 

Proficient – Autonomously correlates examples, facts, or theories from multiple disciplines.

Basic – Attempts to correlate examples, facts, or theories from multiple disciplines.

Below Expectations – Displays inconsistent examples, facts, or theories from multiple disciplines.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.17

Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.17

Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic – Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 0.16

Distinguished – The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient – The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 0.16

Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient – Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations – Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

 

Assignmentsonline.org help students to solve their assignment in the best possible manner. In the assignment help industry, we are regarded as one of the best helpers for students’ tasks in all subjects. We provide solutions to students from all corners of the world, but the main focus is from students residing in the US, UK, and Australia. Our primary focus is solving student assignments for all subjects and streams.

Place Order NOw

Assignment online is a team of top-class experts whose only goal is to give you the best assignment help service. Follow the link below to order now...

#write essay #research paper