2023 In 750 1 000 words do the following Describe the politics administration dichotomy Explain both sides of the debate on whether | Assignments Online

 

In 750-1,000 words, do the following:

1. Describe the politics-administration dichotomy.
2. Explain both sides of the debate on whether the politics-administration dichotomy exists in practice or only in theory. Give specific real-world examples in your debate.
3. Describe what side you tend to agree with more and why.

Use two to four scholarly resources to support your explanations.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Rubrics :

 Politics-Administration Dichotomy

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%

3
Satisfactory
79.00%

4
Good
87.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

70.0 %Content

20.0 %Describe the politics-administration dichotomy.

Description of the politics-administration dichotomy is missing.

Description of the politics-administration dichotomy is vague and inconsistent.

Description of the politics-administration dichotomy is present and supported by some research.

Description of the politics-administration dichotomy is present, clear, and supported by research.

Description of the politics-administration dichotomy is clear, concise, and supported by research.

25.0 %Explain both sides of the debate on whether the politics-administration dichotomy exists in practice or only in theory. Give specific real-world examples in your debate.

Explanation of both sides of the debate, whether the politics-administration dichotomy exists in practice or only in theory, are missing. Real-world examples in student’s debate are also missing.

Explanation of both sides of the debate, whether the politics-administration dichotomy exists in practice or only in theory, are vague and inconsistent. Real-world examples in student’s debate are also vague.

Explanation of both sides of the debate, whether the politics-administration dichotomy exists in practice or only in theory, are present and supported by research. Real-world examples in student’s debate are also present.

Explanation of both sides of the debate, whether the politics-administration dichotomy exists in practice or only in theory, are present, clear, and supported by research. Real-world examples in your debate are also present and clear.

Explanation of both sides of the debate, whether the politics-administration dichotomy exists in practice or only in theory, are clear, concise, and supported by research. Real-world examples in your debate are also clear and concise.

25.0 %Describe what side you tend to agree with more and why.

Description of what side student tends to agree with and why is missing.

Description of what side student tends to agree with and why is vague and inconsistent.

Description of what side student tends to agree with and why is present.

Description of what side student tends to agree with and why is present, clear, and supported by research.

Description of what side student tends to agree with and why is clear, concise, and supported by research.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage