analyse an interview of a corporate governance practitioner and apply this learning to organisations
- Summarise arguments made in the interview (transcript attached) and provide a coherent explanation of your agreement or disagreement with points made by the interviewee 25%
- Critically analyse two organisations with respect to governance, contrasting an example of good governance with an example of bad governance, providing recommendations for improvements where this is lacking 50%
- Structure your writing for clarity and use language correctly 12.5%
- Properly reference an academic essay in corporate governance using quality sources (inc. seminal and reading list items) 12.5%
> 
analyse an interview of a corporate governance practitioner and apply this learning to organisations.
- Q1: Summarise key points being made in the interview. Comment on aspects of the interview which you strongly agreed or disagreed. Around 600 words.
- Q2: Use the interview arguments to analyse an Australian organisation with good corporate governance. Describe its governance system. Why do you believe this is good governance? Around 650 words.
> 
analyse an interview of a corporate governance practitioner and apply this learning to organisations.
- Q3: Contrast this organisation with another Australian organisation you believe demonstrates poor corporate governance. Describe its governance system. Why do you believe this is poor corporate governance? Around 650 words.
> 
analyse an interview of a corporate governance practitioner and apply this learning to organisations.
> 
analyse an interview of a corporate governance practitioner and apply this learning to organisations.
- Q4: Provide recommendations for improving corporate governance for this organisation. Support your recommendations with literature (minimum 5 peer reviewed articles) Around 600 words.
> 
analyse an interview of a corporate governance practitioner and apply this learning to organisations.
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!