Part 1 Stockholders and Management Interests Stockholders and managers want the same thing don t september 2023
Managerial finance Discussion 3
Part 1: Stockholders and Management Interests Stockholders and managers want the same thing, don’t they? Theoretically, yes, but in reality, it does not always work that way. Too often, managers’ personal goals compete with shareholder wealth maximization. Sometimes, managers pay themselves excessive salaries or bonuses that are at odds with the idea of shareholder wealth maximization. How many times have you seen in the news examples of CEO excesses or outlandish spending on events or things that definitely do not help the overall goal of stockholder wealth maximization? To prepare for this Discussion, think about a time in your professional experience when a decision was made that seemed to benefit a specific manager or small group of managers and not the overall corporation. If you do not have professional experience directly related to this topic, research a situation in the news where this theme is demonstrated. Consider the outcomes of such an imbalance between manager and stockholder interests, and research on how to avoid such a situation. Describe the situation from either your professional experience or your research. Explain two or more motivational tools that can aid in aligning stockholder and management interests. Explain how your selected tools are effective in resolving potential conflicts among managers and stockholders. Support your discussion with appropriate academically reviewed articles. Use APA format throughout. Part 2: Application of Concepts/Time Value of Money Review the video links below. Based on the materials presented in these videos, discuss how you will use the time value of money concepts in managerial decision making. Be specific and give examples based on your experience or research. Time Value of Money : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3azU7gYHc0&feature=emb_logo Bonds: http://www.teachmefinance.com/bondvaluation.html STUDENT RESPONSES : . Read and respond to your classmates. Respond to at least 3 of your classmates’ posts. In your response to your classmates, consider comparing cash generation techniques at your company versus his or her company. Draw distinctions based on the industry and tell your colleagues why those distinctions are necessary for the management of cash flow. Below are additional suggestions on how to respond to your classmates’ discussions: · Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence or research. · Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives. · Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research. · Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research. · Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings. · Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence. 1ST STUDENT (Divyang) : Here is a part of the gutters precedents, who gain huge severence of bundles independent of reality, or compasses perform great or not Lee Raymond at Exxon Mobil: $ 321 million Lee Raymond, the dubious former CEO of Exxon Mobil, who used his official seat as a podium to take his distrust into a dangerous atmosphere, earned $ 321 million when he became CEO in 2005. Then he turned away, Charles M. Elson, head of the John L. Weinberg Management and Management Center at Delaware University, exclaimed that “Exxon was there before Raymond was there, and there will be long after he appears, but Rockefeller to return, to the limb. ” Bob Nardelli at Home Depot: $223 Million By the time Bob Nardelli was appointed CEO of Home Depot in 2007, he earned $ 223 million. As reported by GMI, “Investors were extremely sophisticated for Nardelli’s earnings, which reached $ 131 million in all payouts in 2006, regardless of the dormant cost of shares.” He cleared the organization after the Board of Directors asked him to more closely link his compensation to the investor’s profit. “As part of the agreement, Mr. Nardelli has earned $ 100 million in benefits and severance payments. (Bruno, S.) The two basic motivational tools that everyone uses to force others to take the necessary steps from age are reward and fear. Here are the two 1.Managerial compensation 2. Threat of firing 1. managerial compensation: Administrative rewards should not only evolve to have administrators but have yet to adjust the interests of bosses to the interests of investors, which can reasonably be expected. This is usually ended with an annual wage as a performance fee and shares with friends. The organization’s shares are usually allocated to the administrator either: Execution actions in which executives get a specific number offer in the light of the organization’s performance. (Joseph, L.) Official investment opportunities that enable the director to buy shares in the future and costs. With the use of investment opportunities, administrators will adapt to investors’ enthusiasm as they will be the investors themselves. 2. Threat of firing: The chance that investors are desperate with current governance can support the current headquarters in changing the current administration, or investors can re-select other senior management personnel to do the job. So, I believe that these devices can be powerful in solving potential conflicts between Chiefs and Investors whenever they are used convincingly. Part 2: The time estimate of money is the central idea of a reserve that announces that money currently open is now a comparable whole later. This is based on a potential security limit. The rule fights money that can get insurance and supplements after a certain period of time, so it has a more substantial value today. In addition, it is more financially important to have a certain amount of money and pass it quickly because the swelling may, after a certain period of time, reduce the gaining power of a comparable aggregate. Time considerations apply to all areas of a cash-generating organization and can be used to select capital formation, stock and securities valuation strategies, vehicle budgeting, leasing and capital costs. Future Value: Future value is used to find how much a wage will be worth later on by considering credit expenses or capital increments over different periods. The future estimation of an endeavor is discovered by copying the key entirety and the credit cost, by then adding the recouped energy to the essential aggregate. References: Joseph, L. Managing for the long term. Retrieved from< https://hbr.org/2017/05/managing-for-the-long-term> Bruno, S. Managers should be paid like Bureaucrats. Retrieved from
Online Assignment help for students and assignment writing services from Top Rated USA Experts at Affordable Prices. On-Time Delivery, 24/7 Chat Assistance.